Research the case against Bernie Madoff who was convicted in 2009 for running the largest Ponzi scheme in U. S. history. Do you think that Bernie received a sentence that was fair? Most importantly, research David Friehling, Bernie's auditor. Discuss what David Friehling's role was in this scheme. What outcome occurred from the legal action taken against Friehling.

Research the case against Bernie Madoff who was convicted in 2009 for running the largest Ponzi scheme in U. S. history. Do you think that Bernie received a sentence that was fair? Most importantly, research David Friehling, Bernie's auditor. Discuss what David Friehling's role was in this scheme. What outcome occurred from the legal action taken against Friehling.

Business Its Legal Ethical & Global Environment

10th Edition

ISBN:9781305224414

Author:JENNINGS

Publisher:JENNINGS

Chapter19: Governance And Regulation

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 2DQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

CASE: You are a fraud expert and have been asked to investigate possible wrongdoing at a local nonprofit organization. You suspect that one of the workers, Stacey, has been embezzling money. After securing enough evidence to be very confident of Stacey's guilt, you speak with the president of the organization, Jamie. Jamie assures you that Stacey could be doing nothing wrong, that she has known Stacey for years, and Stacey is a good person. Further, she indicates that because of her relationship with Stacey, even if something were going wrong, no action would be taken with respect to the potential fraud. QUESTIONS: 1)How do you respond to Jamie? How do you explain to her what is at stake? 2) What monitoring and control systems should have been in place at Jamie's organization to prevent such a behavior? Explain. 3)Would you recommend an ethics audit to this company? Why?
After the Madoff case, the SEC instituted a number of reforms to its operations. Please visit the SEC’s website (www.sec.gov) and search for Post-Madoff reforms. Next, please identify the two reforms that you believe will have the best chance of catching a criminal like Madoff. Make sure to provide justification for your choices.
Controversy tends to surround the topic of whistleblowers. For example, should they be considered heroes or traitors? Many pro-whistleblowing policies have been enacted by the federal government to allow these individuals to reap significant monetary rewards for coming forward and giving information about behaviors and actions such as corporate fraud and unethical deeds. Many corporate whistleblowers face negative consequences of their actions, such as reassignment, revenge, and hate crimes, and are seen as traitors (e.g., Edward Snowden and Gina Gray). Yet Sherron Watkins and Cynthia Cooper were celebrated as heroes. Look up the stories of Sherron Watkins and Cynthia Cooper. Why do you think that some whistleblowers are vilified and others made to be heroes?
Answer the following based on the image of the scenario A-Help management understand the issue from Jack’s perspective. Describe the ethical dilemma that Jack faces. What is the issue? Who are the parties involved? If you were Jack, what would you consider when making a decision? B-Help management understand the elements of the fraud triangle in this situation which increase the chances of fraud. Why is this fraud? What are the opportunities, motivations and rationalizations that you see? How does this affect the business financially? C-Help management come up with a plan to minimize the likelihood of this happening in the future. Be sure to mention specific components of the COSO framework.
5. What does Tina mean in her statement to the Clare County Review "the effects of an embezzlement are far reaching and detrimental for everyone"? Who were all the stakeholders that were all affected in this case? How was each of them harmed? 6. Jenifer was caught embezzling via the payroll system, how else might she have been stealing from the company that was never proven? 7. Why do you think Jenifer embezzled the money? 8. Do you think her sentencing is too lenient, too harsh, or is appropriate? Why? 9. What would you do if your friend and employee was stealing from a company that you owned?
During an internal investigation, Black, a Certified Fraud Examiner, interviewed Green, a fraud suspect. Although Green wanted to leave in the middle of the interview, Black blocked the exit and prevented him from leaving. Green subsequently confessed to committing fraud. If, under these facts, Green files a lawsuit for false imprisonment against Black, Black will likely: A. Win the case because the qualified business privilege protects investigators conducting internal investigations. B. Win the case because Green confessed to the fraud. C. Lose the case if a trier of fact concludes that he restrained Green without consent or legal justification. D. Lose the cans because Green did not leave the interview.
Watch the video and share with us your thoughts about the below questions:How do you define "ethics"?If you, as an American, are doing business in a country where bribery is not illegal, or unethical, how would you justify your decision to either proceed with bribery or not proceed with using bribery?
In his Ponzi scheme, what did Abraham Kennard use to lure his victims? Group of answer choices A. Loans to corporations headed by African Americans B. Investment opportunities for black investment bankers C. Promise of grants to black preachers D. Insurance coverage for members of black churches
To what degree do you think individuals have a responsibility to act ethically within a corrupt system? How would an individual act ethically in this context? Please answer thoroughly and in depth. What legal reforms would you recommend that would make lobbyists more likely to act ethically? Why would you recommend these reforms and how might you implement them? Please answer thoroughly and in depth.
During the interview of a suspect in an embezzlement case, several common themes are developed that make the offense seem morally acceptable to the suspect. Which of the following is NOT commonly used with embezzlers and other fraud offenders? A. “Borrowing” versus “stealing” B. “Did it for the family” C. “Not being paid enough” D. “Protesting an unjust law”
While conducting a fraud examination, Black, a Certified Fraud Examiner, obtained a document in 2013. Since Black obtained the document, several individuals have had it in their possession. In 2017, the document was introduced at trial. The defense objected to the admission of the document because there was no record of who had possession of the document and what they did with it. The defense’s objection is based on a failure to maintain __________. A. The evidence log. B. The relevance. C. The chain of custody. D. Who validated the evidence.
Firstly, we would like you to read the article The Fall of Enron , published in the Journal of Economic Perspectives (2003) by Paul M. Healy and Krishna G. Palepu. We would like you to provide a written description of the Enron scandal, that explains the reasons that led to the scandals and provide a brief summary of the timeline of the scandal. Detail the role of the different actors involved in the scandal. and explain the ethical aspects that were breached in this scandal.