Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Math
Statistics
6.13 Public option, Part I: A Washington Post article from 2009 reported that "support for a government- run health-care plan to compete with private insurers has rebounded from its summertime lows and wins clear majority support from the public." More specifically, the article says "seven in 10 Democrats back the plan, while almost nine in 10 Republicans oppose it. Independents divide 52 percent against, 42 percent in favor of the legislation." (6% responded with "other".) There were 819 Democrats, 566 Republicans and 783 Independents surveyed. (a) A political pundit on TV claims that a majority of Independents oppose the health care public option plan. Do these data provide strong evidence to support this statement? Write the hypotheses used to test the pundit's statement: O Ho: Pindependent against .52 Ha: Pindependent against <.52 = O Ho: Pindependent against = 5 Ha: Pindependent against = .52 O Ho: Pindependent against = .5 H₂: Pindependent against > .5 What is the p-value associated with this hypothesis test? (please round to four decimal places) What is the conclusion of the hypothesis test? Since psa we reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative Since p > a we accept the null hypothesis O Since p≥ a we reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative Since p a we do not have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis The meaning of this conclusion in the context of our investigation is: The data provide strong evidence to support the pundit's statement

6.13 Public option, Part I: A Washington Post article from 2009 reported that "support for a government- run health-care plan to compete with private insurers has rebounded from its summertime lows and wins clear majority support from the public." More specifically, the article says "seven in 10 Democrats back the plan, while almost nine in 10 Republicans oppose it. Independents divide 52 percent against, 42 percent in favor of the legislation." (6% responded with "other".) There were 819 Democrats, 566 Republicans and 783 Independents surveyed. (a) A political pundit on TV claims that a majority of Independents oppose the health care public option plan. Do these data provide strong evidence to support this statement? Write the hypotheses used to test the pundit's statement: O Ho: Pindependent against .52 Ha: Pindependent against <.52 = O Ho: Pindependent against = 5 Ha: Pindependent against = .52 O Ho: Pindependent against = .5 H₂: Pindependent against > .5 What is the p-value associated with this hypothesis test? (please round to four decimal places) What is the conclusion of the hypothesis test? Since psa we reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative Since p > a we accept the null hypothesis O Since p≥ a we reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative Since p a we do not have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis The meaning of this conclusion in the context of our investigation is: The data provide strong evidence to support the pundit's statement

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
See similar textbooks
icon
Related questions
Question
Please help!
6.13 Public option, Part I: A Washington Post article from 2009 reported that "support for a government- run health-care plan to compete with private insurers has rebounded from its summertime lows and wins clear majority support from the public." More specifically, the article says "seven in 10 Democrats back the plan, while almost nine in 10 Republicans oppose it. Independents divide 52 percent against, 42 percent in favor of the legislation." (6% responded with "other".) There were 819 Democrats, 566 Republicans and 783 Independents surveyed. (a) A political pundit on TV claims that a majority of Independents oppose the health care public option plan. Do these data provide strong evidence to support this statement? Write the hypotheses used to test the pundit's statement: O Ho: Pindependent against = .52 Ha: Pindependent against <.52 O Ho: Pindependent against = 5 Ha: Pindependent against = .52 = .5 O Ho: Pindependent against Ha: Pindependent against > .5 What is the p-value associated with this hypothesis test? (please round to four decimal places) What is the conclusion of the hypothesis test? O Since psa we reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative Since p > a we accept the null hypothesis Since p≥ a we reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative Since p<a we fail to reject the null hypothesis Since pz a we do not have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis The meaning of this conclusion in the context of our investigation is: The data provide strong evidence to support the pundit's statement DELL
Transcribed Image Text:6.13 Public option, Part I: A Washington Post article from 2009 reported that "support for a government- run health-care plan to compete with private insurers has rebounded from its summertime lows and wins clear majority support from the public." More specifically, the article says "seven in 10 Democrats back the plan, while almost nine in 10 Republicans oppose it. Independents divide 52 percent against, 42 percent in favor of the legislation." (6% responded with "other".) There were 819 Democrats, 566 Republicans and 783 Independents surveyed. (a) A political pundit on TV claims that a majority of Independents oppose the health care public option plan. Do these data provide strong evidence to support this statement? Write the hypotheses used to test the pundit's statement: O Ho: Pindependent against = .52 Ha: Pindependent against <.52 O Ho: Pindependent against = 5 Ha: Pindependent against = .52 = .5 O Ho: Pindependent against Ha: Pindependent against > .5 What is the p-value associated with this hypothesis test? (please round to four decimal places) What is the conclusion of the hypothesis test? O Since psa we reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative Since p > a we accept the null hypothesis Since p≥ a we reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative Since p<a we fail to reject the null hypothesis Since pz a we do not have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis The meaning of this conclusion in the context of our investigation is: The data provide strong evidence to support the pundit's statement DELL
Chapter & Problem SetiGRAL X + urses/10172/assignments/244645?module_item_id=747217 O Ho: Pindependent against =.52 Ha: Pindependent against < .52 O Ho: Pindependent against = -5 Ha: Pindependent against = .52 O Ho: Pindependent against = -5 Ha: Pindependent against > .5 What is the p-value associated with this hypothesis test? (please round to four decimal places) What is the conclusion of the hypothesis test? O Since p<a we reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative O Since p≥ a we accept the null hypothesis Since p > a we reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative Since p<a we fail to reject the null hypothesis O Since p≥ a we do not have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis The meaning of this conclusion in the context of our investigation is: O The data provide strong evidence to support the pundit's statement O The data does not provide strong evidence to support the pundit's statement (b) Would you expect a confidence interval for the proportion of Independents who oppose the public option plan to include 0.5? Explain. O No O Yes Question Help: Post to forum 31 DELL
Transcribed Image Text:Chapter & Problem SetiGRAL X + urses/10172/assignments/244645?module_item_id=747217 O Ho: Pindependent against =.52 Ha: Pindependent against < .52 O Ho: Pindependent against = -5 Ha: Pindependent against = .52 O Ho: Pindependent against = -5 Ha: Pindependent against > .5 What is the p-value associated with this hypothesis test? (please round to four decimal places) What is the conclusion of the hypothesis test? O Since p<a we reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative O Since p≥ a we accept the null hypothesis Since p > a we reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative Since p<a we fail to reject the null hypothesis O Since p≥ a we do not have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis The meaning of this conclusion in the context of our investigation is: O The data provide strong evidence to support the pundit's statement O The data does not provide strong evidence to support the pundit's statement (b) Would you expect a confidence interval for the proportion of Independents who oppose the public option plan to include 0.5? Explain. O No O Yes Question Help: Post to forum 31 DELL
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps with 2 images

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS