49-5. Landlord-Tenant Relationships. Bhanmattie Kumar was walking on a sidewalk in Flushing, New York, when she tripped over a chipped portion of the sidewalk and fell. The defective sidewalk was in front of a Pretty Girl store one of a chain of apparel stores headquartered in Brooklyn-on premises leased from PI Associates, LLC. Kumar filed a claim in a New York state court against PI, seeking to recover damages for her injuries. PI filed a cross-claim against Pretty Girl. On what basis would the court impose liability on PI? In what situation would Pretty Girl be the liable party? Is there any circumstance in which Kumar could be at least partially responsible for her injury? Discuss. [Bhanmattie Rajkumar Kumar v. PI Associates, LLC, 125 A.D.3d 609, 3 N.Y.S.3d 372 (2 Dept. 2015)] (See Landlord-Tenant Relationships.)

icon
Related questions
Question
100%
49-5. Landlord-Tenant Relationships. Bhanmattie Kumar was walking on a
sidewalk in Flushing, New York, when she tripped over a chipped portion of the
sidewalk and fell. The defective sidewalk was in front of a Pretty Girl store-one of a
chain of apparel stores headquartered in Brooklyn-on premises leased from PI
Associates, LLC. Kumar filed a claim in a New York state court against PI, seeking to
recover damages for her injuries. PI filed a cross-claim against Pretty Girl. On what
basis would the court impose liability on PI? In what situation would Pretty Girl be
the liable party? Is there any circumstance in which Kumar could be at least
partially responsible for her injury? Discuss. [Bhanmattie Rajkumar Kumar v. PI
Associates, LLC, 125 A.D.3d 609, 3 N.Y.S.3d 372 (2 Dept. 2015)] (See Landlord-Tenant
Relationships.)
Transcribed Image Text:49-5. Landlord-Tenant Relationships. Bhanmattie Kumar was walking on a sidewalk in Flushing, New York, when she tripped over a chipped portion of the sidewalk and fell. The defective sidewalk was in front of a Pretty Girl store-one of a chain of apparel stores headquartered in Brooklyn-on premises leased from PI Associates, LLC. Kumar filed a claim in a New York state court against PI, seeking to recover damages for her injuries. PI filed a cross-claim against Pretty Girl. On what basis would the court impose liability on PI? In what situation would Pretty Girl be the liable party? Is there any circumstance in which Kumar could be at least partially responsible for her injury? Discuss. [Bhanmattie Rajkumar Kumar v. PI Associates, LLC, 125 A.D.3d 609, 3 N.Y.S.3d 372 (2 Dept. 2015)] (See Landlord-Tenant Relationships.)
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer