Overview of the Issue
In the scenario given, without an alternative, OCF probably has to initiate changes in its capital structure to drive off hostile takeover attempts from Wickes. There are a few a ways the capital structure can be changed, i) recapitalize by retiring equity with debt (swap), ii) simply assume more debt, iii) issue more shares, or iv)buy back shares. An under levered firm can increase its debt ratio by borrowing money and buying back stock or paying a super dividend to its stock holders. Borrowing money increases the debt level, while buying back stock reduces number of outstanding shares, thereby decreasing MVE and paying dividend reduces stock price, thereby reducing MVE as well. OCF can also use debt for equity swap
…show more content…
Similarly with tax rate varying from 30% to 40% and terminal growth rate varying from 3% to 5%, the per share compensation varies from $71 to $86.
Restructuring of OFC
In a takeover proposal the management of the target should always consider its action form a shareholder perspective. Whether this is always the case or not, management should at least be prepared to justify its suggested course of action and its potential objection to a takeover based on the share holder value. The proposed cash offer at $74 per share and the historic stock price at $48 indicate that under current management the OFC appears to be worth less than it could. Therefore a starting point should be to analyze OFC’s potential value after restructuring and proposed debt take on. Based on the supplied management forecast the share price after restructuring can be in the range from $46-$52. So all doubts about the credibility of the forecast and the availability of leverage this valuation already indicates that it might not be in the share holder interest for management to pursue a takeover defense.
Facing this attractive bid and with no fundamental operating changes in sight, management has to consider where the additional funds to compensate share holders adequately are coming from. Looking at the current ownership structure, we have about 95% of shares trading public, while 5% are reserved for pension liabilities. In an attempt to outbid the offer
It is agreed that in your explanation you will assume that corporations have a state-plus-federal income tax rate of 40 percent, and you will use the top personal tax rate of 39.6 percent.
For cash compensation package, tax consideration also decreases the value. Cash bonus is taxed at ordinary tax rate, so Ms. Jameson receive $5000 x (1-0.28) = $3,600 today, and $4,450.82[5] at the next five years. However, there is a risk that Ms. Jameson’s marginal tax rate is changed. For the worst case, tax rate might reach as high as 31%, and this results in the value of $4,265.37[6] at the end of the fifth year.
Nevertheless, the use of the Optimal Capital Structure (OCS) is the right techniques to be used in order to acquire the right combination of debt and equity that can maximize the
Spartan Plastic LimitedCase StudyProblem Statement:Spartan Plastics Canada Limited is a subsidiary of Spartan International U.S.A. Spartan manufactured extruded plastic parts. Mr. David Angove was the vice-president of the company. It is a small company with only 50 employees, the company manufacturing process is complex, since the company had been improved the manufacturing process from the original to modified, there are still many problems appearing in the company.
addition, the company has an applicable tax rate of 40% and no unused tax loss or credit carryforwards.
Aside from the two aforementioned proposals the company can raise its leverage in other ways. By conducting DuPont analysis and understanding operating leverage we see that purchasing fixed assets and decreasing stockholder’s equity will raise the equity multiplier and the firm’s operating leverage. In this instance we recommend against this approach as the firm already has a large amount of excess cash above what they require to fund new positive NPV projects and purchase new assets. Investors would rather see their capital returned to them in the form of share repurchases and dividends as it is evident by the company’s cash stockpile that they can
The 50% premium can be explained by the valuation of the firm based purely on its projected future cash flows and assumed growth rate (value = $391.58 million) plus the added value that the ITS can provide (value = $114.2 million) when the leveraged buyout is completed. There are two components to the ITS or income tax shield –
Your employer, a mid-sized human resources management company, is considering expansion into related fields, including the acquisition of Temp Force Company, an employment agency that supplies word processor operators and computer programmers to businesses with temporary heavy workloads. Your employer is also considering the purchase of a Biggerstaff & Biggerstaff (B&B), a privately held company owned by two brothers, each with 5 million shares of stock. B&B currently has free cash flow of $24 million, which is expected to grow at a constant rate of 5%. B&B’s financial statements report marketable securities of $100 million, debt of $200 million, and preferred stock of $50 million.
Referring to Vice President of Finance, he want to pursue the current approach because they are in profitable based on contribution margin by 35 percent. The company just needs to monitor their margin in control their cost well.
3. What restructuring option – Icahn’s spin-off proposal or the company’s targeted stock proposal – will create the most value for shareholders? For creditors? For the firm’s other stakeholders?
2. Evaluate the two offers in Exhibit 7. What explains the two structures? In each case, what is the value to MCI shareholders?
Our estimated cost of capital, 20.81%, is lower than Ricketts’ expected return, 30%-50%, thus the investment is worthy. However, it’s higher than other pessimistic members’ expected return, 10%-15%, making the decision more complex and requiring further valuation。
The previous 959.6m Amoco shares will convert into 633.336m shares of BP ADS equivalent, with the previous 965.6m ADS shares, BP shareholders will take part 60% of the new company, still have majority control over the firm. In this deal, we paid for about 20% premium, which is quite standard and normal. Because synergies from revenue and chemical divisions’ combination are not estimated nor not expected to bring benefit, the main synergy from the merge is 2 billion dollars saving of pretax operating cost. The value we create for our shareholders is $14,840.06 million (Amoco stand-alone value $46,430 million+ synergy $2 billion – price paid for Amoco $33,538.94). But this number is quite sensitive to a lot of factors, such as future energy demand, oil and gas price, industry growth potentials, ultimately affecting Amoco’s stand-alone and synergy valuation. Please
Andrea Winfield considered issuing bonds was not a good option for financing the acquisition. She was particularly concerned about the increasing long-term debt and annual cash layout of $ 6.25 million for 15 years. We believe that her concerns are justified, because the Company had already significant amount of debt that could result in higher risks and stock price
Executive Summary. Wathen is attempting to value the proposed acquisition of Pinkerton in an effort to determine whether bids of $85 million to $100 million is value enhancing for CPP’s shareholders. Additionally, Wathen must choose between two financing options: (1) raising $100 Million via a $75 million debt structure at 11.5% interest rate together with a $25 million equity investment for a 45% stake in the combined company and (2) a $100 million debt facility at 13.5% interest rate.