(a) What is the optimal solution, and what is the value of the total annual return (in $)? U H estimated annual return $ (b) Which constraints are binding? What is your interpretation of these constraints in terms of the problem? (Select all that apply.) Constraint 1. All funds available are being utilized. Constraint 2. The maximum permissible risk is being incurred. Constraint 3. All available shares of U.S. Oil are being purchased. None of the constraints are binding. (c) What are the dual values for the constraints? Interpret each. (Round your answers to two decimal places.) constraint 1 O Constraint 1 has a dual value of 3. If an additional dollar is added to the available funds, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $3. O Constraint 1 has a dual value of 1.33. If an additional dollar is added to the available funds, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $1.33. O Constraint 1 has a dual value of 0.09. If an additional dollar is added to the available funds, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $0.09. O Constraint 1 has a dual value of 5. If an additional dollar is added to the available funds, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $5. O Constraint 1 has a slack of $200. Additional dollars added to the available funds will not improve the total annual return. constraint 2 O Constraint 2 has a dual value of 3. If the risk index is increased by 1, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $3. O Constraint 2 has a dual value of 1.33. If the risk index is increased by 1, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $1.33. O Constraint 2 has a dual value of 0.09. If the risk index is increased by 1, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $0.09. O Constraint 2 has a dual value of 5. If the risk index is increased by 1, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $5. O Constraint 2 has a slack of 200. Allowing additional risk will not improve the total annual return. constraint 3 O Constraint 3 has a dual value of 3. If the maximum number of shares of U.S. Oil is increased by 1, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $3. Constraint 3 has a dual value of 1.33. If the maximum number of shares of U.S. Oll is increased by 1, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $1.33. O Constraint 3 has a dual value of 0.09. If the maximum number of shares of U.S. Oll is increased by 1, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $0.09. O Constraint 3 has a dual value of 5. If the maximum number of shares of U.S. Oil is increased by 1, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $5. O Constraint 3 has a slack of 200 shares. Raising the maximum number of shares of U.S. Oil will not improve the total annual return. (d) Would it be beneficial to increase the maximum amount invested in U.S. Oil? Why or why not? O Yes, each additional share increases the profit by $200.00. O Yes, each additional share increases the profit by $1.33. O Yes, each additional share increases the profit by $0.09. O No, increasing the maximum shares does not affect the optimal value.

Practical Management Science
6th Edition
ISBN:9781337406659
Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Chapter2: Introduction To Spreadsheet Modeling
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 20P: Julie James is opening a lemonade stand. She believes the fixed cost per week of running the stand...
icon
Related questions
Question
Investment Advisors, Inc., is a brokerage firm that manages stock portfolios for a number of clients. A particular portfolio consists of U shares of U.S. Oil and H shares of Huber Steel. The annual
return for U.S. Oil is $3 per share and the annual return for Huber Steel is $5 per share. U.S. Oil sells for $25 per share and Huber Steel sells for $50 per share. The portfolio has $80,000 to be
invested. The portfolio risk index (0.50 per share of U.S. Oil and 0.25 per share for Huber Steel) has a maximum of 700. In addition, the portfolio is limited to a maximum of 1,000 shares of U.S. Oil.
The linear programming formulation that will maximize the total annual return of the portfolio is as follows.
Maximize total annual return
Max 3U + 5H
s.t.
25U + 50H ≤ 80,000
0.50U +0.25H ≤
700
≤ 1,000
1U
U, H ≥ 0
The computer output is shown below.
Optimal Objective Value = 8400.00000
Variable
U
H
Constraint
1
2
3
Variable
U
H
Constraint
1
2
3
Value
800.00000
1200.00000
estimated annual return
Slack/Surplus Dual Value
0.09333
1.33333
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
200.00000
Funds available
Risk maximum
U.S. Oil maximum
Objective Allowable
Coefficient
Increase
7.00000
1.00000
3.00000
5.00000
Reduced Cost
0.00000
0.00000
RHS
Value
80000.00000
700.00000
1000.00000
Allowable
Decrease
0.50000
3.50000
Allowable
Increase
60000.00000
75.00000
Infinite
Allowable
Decrease
15000.00000
300.00000
200.00000
(a) What is the optimal solution, and what is the value of the total annual return (in $)?
U
H
(b) Which constraints are binding? What is your interpretation of these constraints in terms of the problem? (Select all that apply.)
Constraint 1. All funds available are being utilized.
Constraint 2. The maximum permissible risk is being incurred.
Constraint 3. All available shares of U.S. Oil are being purchased.
None of the constraints are binding.
(c) What are the dual values for the constraints? Interpret each. (Round your answers to two decimal places.)
constraint 1
Constraint 1 has a dual value of 3. If an additional dollar is added to the available funds, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $3.
Constraint 1 has a dual value of 1.33. If an additional dollar is added to the available funds, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $1.33.
Constraint 1 has a dual value of 0.09. If an additional dollar is added to the available funds, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $0.09.
Constraint 1 has a dual value of 5. If an additional dollar is added to the available funds, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $5.
Constraint 1 has a slack of $200. Additional dollars added to the available funds will not improve the total annual return.
constraint 2
Constraint 2 has a dual value of 3. If the risk index is increased by 1, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $3.
Constraint 2 has a dual value of 1.33. If the risk index is increased by 1, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $1.33.
Constraint 2 has a dual value of 0.09. If the risk index is increased by 1, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $0.09.
Constraint 2 has a dual value of 5. If the risk index is increased by 1, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $5.
Constraint 2 has a slack of 200. Allowing additional risk will not improve the total annual return.
constraint 3
Constraint 3 has a dual value of 3. If the maximum number of shares of U.S. Oil is increased by 1, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $3.
Constraint 3 has a dual value of 1.33. If the maximum number of shares of U.S. Oil is increased by 1, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $1.33.
Constraint 3 has a dual value of 0.09. If the maximum number of shares of U.S. Oil is increased by 1, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $0.09.
Constraint 3 has a dual value of 5. If the maximum number of shares of U.S. Oil is increased by 1, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $5.
Constraint 3 has a slack of 200 shares. Raising the maximum number of shares of U.S. Oil will not improve the total annual return.
(d) Would it be beneficial to increase the maximum amount invested in U.S. Oil? Why or why not?
Yes, each additional share increases the profit by $200.00.
Yes, each additional share increases the profit by $1.33.
Yes, each additional share increases the profit by $0.09.
No, increasing the maximum shares does not affect the optimal value.
Transcribed Image Text:Investment Advisors, Inc., is a brokerage firm that manages stock portfolios for a number of clients. A particular portfolio consists of U shares of U.S. Oil and H shares of Huber Steel. The annual return for U.S. Oil is $3 per share and the annual return for Huber Steel is $5 per share. U.S. Oil sells for $25 per share and Huber Steel sells for $50 per share. The portfolio has $80,000 to be invested. The portfolio risk index (0.50 per share of U.S. Oil and 0.25 per share for Huber Steel) has a maximum of 700. In addition, the portfolio is limited to a maximum of 1,000 shares of U.S. Oil. The linear programming formulation that will maximize the total annual return of the portfolio is as follows. Maximize total annual return Max 3U + 5H s.t. 25U + 50H ≤ 80,000 0.50U +0.25H ≤ 700 ≤ 1,000 1U U, H ≥ 0 The computer output is shown below. Optimal Objective Value = 8400.00000 Variable U H Constraint 1 2 3 Variable U H Constraint 1 2 3 Value 800.00000 1200.00000 estimated annual return Slack/Surplus Dual Value 0.09333 1.33333 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 200.00000 Funds available Risk maximum U.S. Oil maximum Objective Allowable Coefficient Increase 7.00000 1.00000 3.00000 5.00000 Reduced Cost 0.00000 0.00000 RHS Value 80000.00000 700.00000 1000.00000 Allowable Decrease 0.50000 3.50000 Allowable Increase 60000.00000 75.00000 Infinite Allowable Decrease 15000.00000 300.00000 200.00000 (a) What is the optimal solution, and what is the value of the total annual return (in $)? U H (b) Which constraints are binding? What is your interpretation of these constraints in terms of the problem? (Select all that apply.) Constraint 1. All funds available are being utilized. Constraint 2. The maximum permissible risk is being incurred. Constraint 3. All available shares of U.S. Oil are being purchased. None of the constraints are binding. (c) What are the dual values for the constraints? Interpret each. (Round your answers to two decimal places.) constraint 1 Constraint 1 has a dual value of 3. If an additional dollar is added to the available funds, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $3. Constraint 1 has a dual value of 1.33. If an additional dollar is added to the available funds, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $1.33. Constraint 1 has a dual value of 0.09. If an additional dollar is added to the available funds, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $0.09. Constraint 1 has a dual value of 5. If an additional dollar is added to the available funds, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $5. Constraint 1 has a slack of $200. Additional dollars added to the available funds will not improve the total annual return. constraint 2 Constraint 2 has a dual value of 3. If the risk index is increased by 1, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $3. Constraint 2 has a dual value of 1.33. If the risk index is increased by 1, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $1.33. Constraint 2 has a dual value of 0.09. If the risk index is increased by 1, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $0.09. Constraint 2 has a dual value of 5. If the risk index is increased by 1, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $5. Constraint 2 has a slack of 200. Allowing additional risk will not improve the total annual return. constraint 3 Constraint 3 has a dual value of 3. If the maximum number of shares of U.S. Oil is increased by 1, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $3. Constraint 3 has a dual value of 1.33. If the maximum number of shares of U.S. Oil is increased by 1, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $1.33. Constraint 3 has a dual value of 0.09. If the maximum number of shares of U.S. Oil is increased by 1, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $0.09. Constraint 3 has a dual value of 5. If the maximum number of shares of U.S. Oil is increased by 1, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $5. Constraint 3 has a slack of 200 shares. Raising the maximum number of shares of U.S. Oil will not improve the total annual return. (d) Would it be beneficial to increase the maximum amount invested in U.S. Oil? Why or why not? Yes, each additional share increases the profit by $200.00. Yes, each additional share increases the profit by $1.33. Yes, each additional share increases the profit by $0.09. No, increasing the maximum shares does not affect the optimal value.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps with 7 images

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Practical Management Science
Practical Management Science
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781337406659
Author:
WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:
Cengage,
Operations Management
Operations Management
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781259667473
Author:
William J Stevenson
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Operations and Supply Chain Management (Mcgraw-hi…
Operations and Supply Chain Management (Mcgraw-hi…
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781259666100
Author:
F. Robert Jacobs, Richard B Chase
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Business in Action
Business in Action
Operations Management
ISBN:
9780135198100
Author:
BOVEE
Publisher:
PEARSON CO
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781285869681
Author:
Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Production and Operations Analysis, Seventh Editi…
Production and Operations Analysis, Seventh Editi…
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781478623069
Author:
Steven Nahmias, Tava Lennon Olsen
Publisher:
Waveland Press, Inc.