preview

Facility Security Evaluation Paper

Decent Essays

My experience with the critical skill of evaluation is most apparent in my ability to accurately review and analyze facility security assessments (FSA). These assessments are prepared and completed by the Federal Protective Service (FPS) Inspectors, and are a vital part of their performance plan and core document. Facility security assessments are comprised of a Vulnerability Survey Reports (VSR) that FPS provides as a unique, yet comprehensive evaluation report that is developed under the Modified Infrastructure Survey Tool (MIST). As the Area Commander, it is my responsibility for overseeing all stages of the assessment process. The FSA includes the VSR in the vulnerability survey report. The VSR evaluates the weakness in the overall …show more content…

Security assessments are assigned and completed on a schedule that is established by ISC standards and Facility Security Level (FSL) ratings. I currently oversee 116 government owned and leased facilities within my area of command. Each of the 116 facilities requires a completion of an FSL, which is a vital part of the assessment process. The FSL is determined based on several factors to include building population, crime statistics and facility occupancy. The FSL calculates specific data entered into the program to produce an accurate security level rating. Each Inspector is assigned the task of completing an FSL on their assigned facility. Once the FSL has been completed, I reevaluate the data based on content and accuracy. The final acceptance of the completed FSL is determined based on the Facility Security Committee (FSC) member’s agreement. The Designated Official (DO) can acknowledge the preexisting rating or disagree with the determination, which is noted as an intangible factor and placed in the comments section of the FSL memo. If the DO decides that the security level should be increased, this can …show more content…

Prior to the introduction of RAMP, FPS utilized the Facility Survey Risk Management (FSRM) program. The FSRM had been a very successful threat based assessment tool. It was easy for the inspector to enter data and allowed for additional information regarding the specifics of the facility to include square footage, population and detail regarding each agency. The FSRM was simplistic in nature, yet detailed enough to explain areas that were deficient regarding facility security levels and the countermeasure implementation to mitigate potential threats. As FPS evolved so did the need for a better assessment program. FPS decided that the FSRM did not meet the criteria of today’s security challenges, leading to the development of RAMP. RAMP mirrored the FSRM in relation to being a threat-based assessment, but was too complicated regarding data entry. There were many setbacks due to programing issues, which created a time compliance conflict affecting its reliability and practical application. The program itself was difficult to implement effectively and required extensive training not only in application but also in presentation. RAMP is not considered a user-friendly program, therefore difficult in application requiring a substantial amount of computer memory just to operate. RAMP was also very difficult to present to

Get Access